upper waypoint

Audio/Video: PG&E Contractor Threatens SmartMeter Refusenik With Disconnection

Save ArticleSave Article
Failed to save article

Please try again

The group Stop SmartMeters posted audio yesterday from Charles Pine, an Oakland homeowner who refused installation of the device by PG&E contractor Wellington Energy. The contractor responded by informing Pine his power would be disconnected. Pine captured the whole thing on a pocket tape recorder.

Listen below:


KGO interview
with Pine:

The PG&E SmartMeter FAQ says only this about about recalcitrant installees:

Can I delay my SmartMeter™ upgrade if I have some questions or concerns?

Any customer who wishes to delay their meter upgrade can call 1-877-743-7378 to be added to the SmartMeter™ delayed installation list.

PG&E spokesman Joe Molica said the following to KGO:

If our employee actually made that statement, we are sorry. Because that is not our policy, and we’re looking into this, and we’re making contact with the customer. We want to find out the facts, and to make it clear that they do have the option of delaying their SmartMeter installation.

In March, at the direction of the CPUC, PG&E came up with an opt-out program, but it only further inflamed the device’s critics. The San Jose Mercury News outlined the plan:

To disconnect the wireless part of a SmartMeter would cost most customers either $135 upfront plus $20 per month to have a technician come out and read the meter, or $270 upfront plus $14 per month. There’s also an unspecified “exit fee” to turn the transmitter back on once opt-out customers have vacated their property.

And if those fees don’t cover the $84.4 million that PG&E estimates the opt-out program will cost the utility over a two-year period, it wants regulators to let it raise power rates even more on its opt-out customers to cover the difference.

Some people claim their health is affected by the meters, which emit a small amount of radiation. A report by the California Council on Science and Technology, released in January, found no health risk evident, but also said more study was warranted. That provided just enough fodder for SmartMeter detractors. Many local governments, who actually have no jurisdiction over the matter, have passed moratoriums on the devices.

Sponsored

lower waypoint
next waypoint
Stunning Archival Photos of the 1906 Earthquake and FireWhy Nearly 50 California Hospitals Were Forced to End Maternity Ward ServicesSan Francisco Sues Oakland Over Plan to Change Airport NameCould Protesters Who Shut Down Golden Gate Bridge Be Charged With False Imprisonment?Democrats Again Vote Down California Ban on Unhoused EncampmentsFederal Bureau of Prisons Challenges Judge’s Order Delaying Inmate Transfers from FCI DublinFirst Trump Criminal Trial Underway in New YorkJail Deaths Prompt Calls To Separate Coroner And Sheriff's Departments In Riverside CountyDespite Progress, Black Californians Still Face Major Challenges In Closing Equality GapThe Beauty in Finding ‘Other People’s Words’ in Your Own