There’s so much material on Watson’s big win on Jeopardy yesterday, it would take me the rest of the day to curate the event intelligently. But here are just a few links for those who want to get a taste of the computer’s victory over the best Jeopardy players in the world, in what either heralds humankind’s inevitable decline at the hands of the machines, or simply means you should forget about trying out for that spot on Wheel of Fortune.
And of course Jon Stewart got in on the act as well.
Yesterday, KQED News intern Shannon Service headed on over to Cobb’s Comedy Club in San Francisco, where a bunch of IBM scientists who had worked on the project congregated to watch their creation’s victory. There, she interviewed John Prager, a developer who worked on helping Watson understand human language.
Sometimes, scientists themselves don’t seem to understand human language — meaning they don’t always give the best interviews because they understandably haven’t done a lot of explaining to laypeople. But Mr. Prager did a good job of talking about Watson’s significance to the field of artificial intelligence, and even addressed a question on people’s fears about what its victory last night represents.
IBM developer says contest shows how artificial Q&A systems can be fallible but still very useful[audio:http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/02/ibmwatson.mp3]
What distinguishes Watson from other computers; how it weighs risk in deciding whether to answer, how it learns, and should be humans be afraid of Watson?[audio:http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/02/ibmwatson2.mp3]
That last point, about being afraid of Watson? That’s kind of funny. I mean, what’s the worst that could possibly happen?