upper waypoint

Calif. Supreme Court Says No Storing Zip Codes

Save ArticleSave Article
Failed to save article

Please try again

(Credit: Flickr/kentb)

You're at the checkout counter with your credit card in hand when the cashier asks for your zip code. You may think the question is leading to a new American Apparel/Whole Foods/John Campbell's Irish Bakery in your neighborhood. That may be, but Williams Sonoma was also building a reverse search database. You know, so the San Francisco-based retailer can figure out where you live....presumably to give you a new reason to update your opt-out profile with Catalog Choice.

Tracking zip codes like that violates the Song-Beverly Credit Card Act of 1971 (Civ. Code, § 1747 et seq.), according to the state Supreme Court.

Today's 17 page ruling overturns an appellate court's 2008 ruling to the contrary. The Supreme Court justices determined unanimously that Williams-Sonoma offered no reason that would justify "departing" from the "statute's plain language, protective purpose and legislative history."

This just in: Google Weddings. I like the Caribbean theme, but isn't Google totally capable of reverse searching what computer I'm browsing on? Isn't Williams-Sonoma as well?

Sponsored

lower waypoint
next waypoint
Why California Environmentalists Are Divided Over Plan to Change Power Utility RatesWhy Renaming Oakland's Airport Is a Big DealAllegations of Prosecutorial Bias Spark Review of Death Penalty Convictions in Alameda CountyCecil Williams, Legendary Pastor of Glide Church, Dies at 94SF Democratic Party’s Support of Unlimited Housing Could Pressure Mayoral CandidatesNurses Warn Patient Safety at Risk as AI Use Spreads in Health CareBay Area Indians Brace for India’s Pivotal 2024 Election: Here’s What to Know‘Sweeps Kill’: Bay Area Homeless Advocates Weigh in on Pivotal US Supreme Court CaseCalifornia’s Future Educators Divided on How to Teach ReadingWhen Rivers Caught Fire: A Brief History of Earth Day