upper waypoint

Calif. Supreme Court Says No Storing Zip Codes

Save ArticleSave Article
Failed to save article

Please try again

(Credit: Flickr/kentb)

You're at the checkout counter with your credit card in hand when the cashier asks for your zip code. You may think the question is leading to a new American Apparel/Whole Foods/John Campbell's Irish Bakery in your neighborhood. That may be, but Williams Sonoma was also building a reverse search database. You know, so the San Francisco-based retailer can figure out where you live....presumably to give you a new reason to update your opt-out profile with Catalog Choice.

Tracking zip codes like that violates the Song-Beverly Credit Card Act of 1971 (Civ. Code, § 1747 et seq.), according to the state Supreme Court.

Today's 17 page ruling overturns an appellate court's 2008 ruling to the contrary. The Supreme Court justices determined unanimously that Williams-Sonoma offered no reason that would justify "departing" from the "statute's plain language, protective purpose and legislative history."

This just in: Google Weddings. I like the Caribbean theme, but isn't Google totally capable of reverse searching what computer I'm browsing on? Isn't Williams-Sonoma as well?

Sponsored

lower waypoint
next waypoint
State Prisons Offset New Inmate Wage Hikes by Cutting Hours for Some WorkersCecil Williams, Legendary Pastor of Glide Church, Dies at 94Erik Aadahl on the Power of Sound in FilmFresno's Chinatown Neighborhood To See Big Changes From High Speed RailKQED Youth Takeover: How Can San Jose Schools Create Safer Campuses?How to Attend a Rally Safely in the Bay Area: Your Rights, Protections and the PoliceWill Less Homework Stress Make California Students Happier?Rainn Wilson from ‘The Office’ on Why We Need a Spiritual RevolutionNurses Warn Patient Safety at Risk as AI Use Spreads in Health CareSilicon Valley House Seat Race Gets a Recount