upper waypoint

Brown Signs Bill Banning State Sale or Display of Confederate Flag

Save ArticleSave Article
Failed to save article

Please try again

The Confederate battle flag waves at a 2000 protest at the South Carolina state Capitol in Columbia. (Erik Perel/AFP)
The Confederate battle flag waves at a 2000 protest at the South Carolina state Capitol in Columbia. (Erik Perel/AFP)

Gov. Jerry Brown has signed a bill that bars state agencies from selling or displaying the Confederate battle flag or any other items that bear the Civil War-era insignia.

The governor signed the bill, AB2444, by Assemblyman Isadore Hall (D-Compton), without comment.

Hall reportedly was inspired to propose the measure after his mother saw replica Confederate currency for sale at a state Capitol gift shop.

Hall, who is African American, has described the flag as "a symbol of racism, exclusion, oppression and violence towards many Americans. Its symbolism and history is directly linked to the enslavement, torture and murder of millions of Americans through the mid-19th century."

Hall's bill passed easily in both the Assembly and Senate. Assemblyman Tim Donnelly (R-Twin Peaks), a tea party conservative, cast the only "no" vote in the lower house, saying the proposal would violate the First Amendment guarantee of free speech.

Sponsored

"I'm a strict Constitutionalist," Donnelly said after the vote, according to the Los Angeles Times. "It's painful and lonely."

Two Republicans voted no in the state Senate -- Steve Knight of Palmdale and Joel Anderson of Alpine -- both citing concerns similar to Donnelly's. The L.A. Times notes that Knight's "no" vote has become an issue in his campaign for Congress:

... Knight said he saw free-speech issues with the bill that could pose problems for private vendors who operate gift shops on state sites.

"It's not that I condone the Confederate flag, but I believe there are constitutional issues," Knight said in an interview Wednesday.

He added that his office is looking into asking the governor's staff to develop a comprehensive policy that could achieve the bill's goal without what he sees as its downsides.

Hall has said that AB2444 doesn't violate the First Amendment because it applies only to government activities and not individuals -- for instance, protesters on state property -- who wish to display the battle flag.

lower waypoint
next waypoint
California PUC Considers New Fixed Charge for ElectricityPro-Palestinian Protests on California College Campuses: What Are Students Demanding?Will the U.S. Really Ban TikTok?Gaza War Ceasefire Talks Continue as Israel Threatens Rafah InvasionKnow Your Rights: California Protesters' Legal Standing Under the First AmendmentCalifornia Forever Shells out $2M in Campaign to Build City from ScratchSaying Goodbye to AsiaSF; New State Mushroom; Farm Workers Buy Mobile Home Park‘I’m Gonna Miss It’: Inside One of AsiaSF’s Last Live Cabarets in SoMaHow Wheelchair Rentals Can Open Up Bay Area Beaches (and Where to Find Them)California Housing Is Even Less Affordable Than You Think, UC Berkeley Study Says