upper waypoint

Google Commits to Deleting 'Incognito' Search Data of Millions

Save ArticleSave Article
Failed to save article

Please try again

An image of the red, yellow, green and blue Google logo.
The Google app icon is seen on a smartphone on Tuesday, Feb. 28, 2023, in Marple Township, Pennsylvania. Google agreed Thursday, Dec. 28, to settle a $5 billion privacy lawsuit claiming that it continued spying on people who used the “incognito” mode in its Chrome browser—along with similar “private browsing” modes in other browsers—to track their internet use.  (Matt Slocum/The Associated Press)

Google will destroy the private browsing history of millions of people who used “incognito” mode in its Chrome browser as a part of a settlement filed to federal court on Monday in a case over the company’s secret tracking of web activity.

For years, Google simply informed users of Chrome’s internet browser that “you’ve gone Incognito” and “now you can browse privately” when the supposedly untraceable browsing option was turned on — without saying what bits of data the company had been harvesting.

Yet, according to a 2020 class-action lawsuit, the tech giant continued to scrape searches by hoovering up data about users who browsed the internet in incognito mode, grabbing “potentially embarrassing” searches of millions of people to measure web traffic and sell advertising.

“Google has made itself an unaccountable trove of information so detailed and expansive that George Orwell could never have dreamed it,” wrote lawyer Mark Mao and other plaintiffs’ attorneys who sued the company.

As the suit was pending, Google changed the splash screen of incognito mode to state that websites, employers, schools and internet service providers can view browsing activity in incognito mode. But under the deal, Google will have to state that the company itself can also track browsing during incognito mode.

Sponsored

In addition, when users use incognito mode, Google will, by default, block third-party companies from tracking peoples’ so-called cookies, which is how advertisers glean information about a person’s search history.

A screenshot of a logo of a hat and glasses under white text that reads "You've gone incognito."
Google now informs users of the limitations of its so-called “incognito mode,” which enables more private web browsing. (NPR)

Class members, including the tens of millions of people who have browsed using incognito mode, will not receive any monetary damages. But individual users are able to sue Google in California state court to recover money over the covert data tracking, according to the agreement.

In a statement, Google spokesman José Castañeda said the company is “happy to delete old technical data that was never associated with an individual and was never used for any form of personalization.” He pointed out that the lawsuit sought $5 billion in damages, but Google will not be making any payment as part of the proposed settlement.

Google employees complained to management about incognito

The suit revealed that Google saved the standard and incognito browsing history of users in the same profile. That data was then used to inform personalized ads that the company served up.

“Even when users are browsing the internet in ‘private browsing mode,’ Google continues to track them,” according to the suit. “Google’s tracking occurred and continues to occur no matter how sensitive or personal users’ online activities are.”

Lawyers representing the consumers who sued Google cited internal emails from the company showing employees complaining to management about incognito mode not living up to its name.

“We need to stop calling it incognito and stop using a Spy Guy icon,” an engineer wrote to Google colleagues in 2018.

Another Google employee recommended changing the incognito splash page to say: “You are NOT protected from Google.”

The suit referenced an email sent by Google’s marketing chief, Lorraine Twohill, to CEO Sundar Pichai, suggesting that the company was misleading the public about the browsing tool.

“We are limited in how strongly we can market incognito because it’s not truly private, thus requiring really fuzzy, hedging language that is almost more damaging,” Twohill wrote Pichai in 2019.

U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers originally set a February trial date for the case, but that was put on hold in light of the agreement hammered out by both parties.

The deal still needs final approval from Gonzalez Rogers.

Copyright 2024 NPR. To see more, visit https://www.npr.org.

lower waypoint
next waypoint
9 California Counties Far From Universities Struggle to Recruit Teachers, Says ReportAlameda County District Attorney Challenges Recall Signature CountSFSU Pro-Palestinian Encampment Established as Students Rally for DivestmentThe Politics and Policy Around Newsom’s Vatican Climate Summit TripAs Border Debate Shifts Right, Sen. Alex Padilla Emerges as Persistent Counterforce for ImmigrantsCity Lights Chief Book Buyer Paul Yamazaki on a Half Century Spent “Reading the Room”Millions of Californians Face Internet Dilemma as Affordable Subsidy EndsInside Mexico's Clandestine Drug Treatment CentersCalifornia Partners with New Jersey Firm to Buy Generic Opioid Overdose Reversal DrugCalifornia’s 2023 Snow Deluge Was a Freak Event, Study Says