upper waypoint

Judge Mulls Mental Competency of Man Who Shot Kate Steinle

Save ArticleSave Article
Failed to save article

Please try again

Jose Ines Garcia Zarate, also known as Juan Francisco Lopez Sanchez, at an arraignment hearing on July 7, 2015, in San Francisco. (Michael Macor-Pool/Getty Images)

A federal judge in San Francisco is mulling the competency to stand trial of an undocumented man who shot and killed 32-year-old Kate Steinle, a shooting that figured prominently in President Trump’s run for the White House four years ago.

The case against Jose Ines Garcia Zarate on federal gun charges has been pending since U.S. District Court Judge Vince Chhabria raised “serious concerns” about his mental capacities back in January, the San Francisco Examiner reported Friday.

“I’m tired of waiting here,” Garcia Zarate told the court Friday through a Spanish interpreter, adding that he wanted to be sentenced to prison or deported back to Mexico.

Two doctors have diagnosed Garcia Zarate with schizophrenia and found him unfit to stand trial because he cannot follow the court proceedings. They said he believes electronics are broadcasting messages to him and other inmates and that he believes his attorney is accepting bribes from the police.

Garcia Zarate has also said he wants to plead guilty. The judge told him he would not be allowed to do so on Friday.

Sponsored

Dr. Samantha Shelton, a forensic psychologist with the U.S. Bureau of Prisons based on Los Angeles, said Garcia Zarate, said “he discussed inmates being placed in spoons, he tended to ruminate on this idea of immigration and being here ‘illegally,’ ” according to the Examiner.

Garcia Zarate has been in detention since the July 1, 2015 shooting on a crowded San Francisco pier, setting off a political firestorm over immigration and crime. Zarate is from Mexico.

A San Francisco Superior Court jury acquitted him of various charges, including murder, in late 2017. An appeals court later overturned the only conviction prosecutors obtained against him, that of being a felon in possession of a firearm.

His defense attorneys in the state case argued he picked up the gun not knowing what it was and fired it accidentally.

lower waypoint
next waypoint
Alameda County District Attorney Challenges Recall Signature CountCalifornia Homeowners Say Oakland Lender Scammed Them Out of $3M in Home ImprovementsFAFSA 2024: The May 2 Deadline for California Students is Almost HereSFSU Pro-Palestinian Encampment Established as Students Rally for DivestmentThousands of San Francisco Residents Saved From Eviction by 2018 Legal Aid MeasureBillionaire-Backed Bid for New Solano County City Is Closer to November BallotWhat’s Next for Pro-Palestinian Campus ProtestsCalifornia’s 2023 Snow Deluge Was a Freak Event, Study SaysInside Mexico's Clandestine Drug Treatment CentersThe Politics and Policy Around Newsom’s Vatican Climate Summit Trip