upper waypoint

New Law Aims to Help Americans Without Retirement Plans. Will it Work?

02:44
Save ArticleSave Article
Failed to save article

Please try again

The Secure Act aims to make it easier for small employers to offer retirement benefits. But some analysts say the new law doesn't go far enough because it's optional and doesn't apply to gig workers. (Alex Edelman/AFP via Getty Images)

The most powerful way to get people to save for retirement in recent decades has been through benefits offered at their job. But a lot of people — about half the American workforce — don't get that from their employers.

"Over 50 million workers right now don't have access to any retirement plan at all," said David Certner, legislative counsel for AARP.

Small employers are the biggest segment lacking coverage, he said. That's because many small businesses lack the time and money to set such programs up, he said.

The new law, called the Secure Act, aims to help with that, in part by allowing smaller employers to band together to share the administrative burden — making it cheaper and easier to offer retirement benefits. How many will do so and expand their retirement benefits is far from clear because the program is optional.

And, Certner said, the law won't apply to many other workers who aren't classified as employees. Contractors or gig workers aren't eligible for those benefits.

Sponsored

The Secure Act also gives people more flexibility to save for longer periods of time and delay withdrawing funds. It allows employers to offer other investment options like annuities.

The fact that the measure passed with overwhelming bipartisan support last month is significant, said Alicia Munnell, director of the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College. But she said the changes are modest.

More Coverage

She notes that the government has tried — and largely failed — to encourage more small businesses to offer retirement benefits through programs like the Treasury Department's now-expired myRA program.

She expects it will be the same with this latest law.

"I don't really think they're really going to move the needle much at all," Munnell said.

The new law requires employers offering retirement benefits to include part-time workers who've been on the job at least three years. That could help about 4 million workers, Munnell said.

Much bigger changes to retirement law have been occurring at the state level, experts say. Ten states — including Oregon, California and Illinois — recently started requiring private employers to enroll their workers in individual retirement accounts if the employers don't offer their own benefits. Those state programs are expected to expand retirement savings to 15 million more people.

"Without a mandate, without somebody saying, 'Mr. Small Businessman, you have to do something for your employees,' I don't think we're going to see much change," Munnell said. That's why, she said, she would like to see such rules extend to all 50 states.

Copyright 2020 NPR. To see more, visit https://www.npr.org.

lower waypoint
next waypoint
9 California Counties Far From Universities Struggle to Recruit Teachers, Says ReportAlameda County District Attorney Challenges Recall Signature CountAs Border Debate Shifts Right, Sen. Alex Padilla Emerges as Persistent Counterforce for ImmigrantsMillions of Californians Face Internet Dilemma as Affordable Subsidy EndsChristina’s Trip: 'I'll Take It'At Least 16 People Died in California After Medics Injected Sedatives During Police EncountersApril News Roundup: Berkeley's Newest Council Member, Reviewing Death Row Sentences, and Pandas Coming to SFCity Lights Chief Book Buyer Paul Yamazaki on a Half Century Spent “Reading the Room”Climate Change Forces State Parks To Re-Think Their GoalsPro-Palestinian Protests Sweep Bay Area College Campuses Amid Surging National Movement