upper waypoint

House Holds Attorney General And Commerce Secretary In Contempt Over Census Probe

Save ArticleSave Article
Failed to save article

Please try again

Attorney General William Barr speaks as he stands with President Donald Trump and Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross during an event about the U.S. Census in the Rose Garden at the White House earlier this month. (Carolyn Kaster/AP)

The House of Representatives escalated their confrontation with the executive branch Wednesday by holding two Trump administration officials in criminal contempt for not providing complete copies of subpoenaed documents related to the 2020 census.

The resolution named Attorney General William Barr and Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross for failing to cooperate with a congressional oversight investigation.

More on the Census citizenship question

In a deeply divided House, Wednesday's criminal contempt measure passed on a mostly party line vote of 230-198. The House's lone independent, Rep. Justin Amash of Michigan, backed the measure. Four Democrats broke with their party and opposed it. The rebuke of Trump cabinet officials comes just a day after the House passed another resolution condemning the president himself for racist tweets over the weekend.

The move marks the second time a sitting attorney general has been found in criminal contempt by the House. The first time was back in 2012, when the House voted to hold then-Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt over his failure to turn over documents for the department's Fast and Furious probe. A group of 17 Democrats joined with what was then a Republican majority to secure that outcome.

In a sign of how long these actions can take, the House and Justice Department engaged in a legal battle that took seven years to resolve – and without resulting in any criminal penalty for Holder.

Shortly before the vote, Barr and Ross sent a letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi urging her to postpone the House action, arguing their departments had made efforts to cooperate with the committee. They also said some of the materials requested were withheld because of the president's decision to assert executive privilege.

"By this action, the House is both unnecessarily undermining inter-branch comity and degrading the constitutional separation of powers and its own integrity," they wrote.

Wednesday's vote was largely a symbolic gesture: It's unlikely that the Department of Justice would move to prosecute the attorney general. The House had previously threatened to pursue a vote on civil contempt against Barr, but backed off after the Justice Department made some concessions.

But the symbolism represents a substantial escalation: These would be the first criminal contempt citations passed since Democrats took control of the House in January.

Ross dismissed the vote as "just more political theater," and noted that his department had handed over thousands of pages of documents over to the committee already.

"We are not stonewalling. But we are also not yielding on the very, very important matter of executive privilege... we are not going to be frightened into changing that position just because of some action the House might take," Ross – who oversees the Census Bureau – told Fox Business Wednesday morning.

House Democrats had demanded information about why the administration sought to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census — and were not satisfied with the response, saying that neither Barr nor Ross responded to a legitimate congressional subpoena.

The Trump administration had earlier told Democrats that they were asserting executive privilege over the requested documents about adding a citizenship question. Democrats on the House Oversight Committee say they need these documents as part of their probe into the origins of the citizenship question.

Democrats have been feuding with the Trump administration over the citizenship question since it was announced last year that the federal government was seeking to add it to the 2020 census.

Sponsored

In recent days, following a Supreme Court decision that stalled the administration's efforts, President Donald Trump announced that he's no longer pushing for the question to be included in the census.

Shortly after, administration officials were formally accused of improperly covering up the question's origins.

Lawyers with the ACLU and other groups challenging the question in court alleged that administration officials "obscured evidence suggesting that the true purpose of Secretary Ross's decision to add a citizenship question to the 2020 Census — suppressing the political power of minority immigrant communities."

Copyright 2019 NPR. To see more, visit https://www.npr.org.

lower waypoint
next waypoint
Pro-Palestinian Protests Sweep Bay Area College Campuses Amid Surging National MovementAt Least 16 People Died in California After Medics Injected Sedatives During Police EncountersCalifornia Regulators Just Approved New Rule to Cap Health Care Costs. Here's How It WorksState Court Upholds Alameda County Tax Measure Yielding Hundreds of Millions for Child CareYouth Takeover: Parents (and Teachers) Just Don't UnderstandSan José Adding Hundreds of License Plate Readers Amid Privacy and Efficacy ConcernsViolence Escalates in Sudan as Civil War Enters Second YearCalifornia Law Letting Property Owners Split Lots to Build New Homes Is 'Unconstitutional,' Judge RulesSF Emergency Dispatchers Struggle to Respond Amid Outdated Systems, Severe UnderstaffingWomen at Troubled East Bay Prison Forced to Relocate Across the Country