As Apple pushes out its new education products, new information about whether using the iPad gives students an advantage over using print books is starting to surface.
Results from Houghton Mifflin Harcourt’s year-long study comparing students using the publisher’s iPad algebra app are in from Amelia Earhart school in Riverside, Calif., and it’s largely positive, according to the company.
The study showed that 78 percent of students who used the HMH algebra iPad app scored “proficient” or “advanced” on the California Standards Test, compared to 59 percent of students who used the textbook version. “As students were randomly assigFuse, the results indicated that use of the app was the chief cause behind the improvement in student test scores,” the report states.
Some of the advantages of the app, according to the report:
- Allowed parents to provide more support to their children: “Parents could watch the videos or review problems with their children to help them if they did not understand.”
- Students were much more motivated during class and were more interested in the subject.
- Changes in student learning outside of the classroom. Students reported reading more and trying to work independently outside of class when completing homework. Also, students were coming to class explaining that they had watched the video multiple times at home.
MindShift covered the pilot project when it first launched last year at the Presidio Middle School in San Francisco.
Algebra teacher Jeanetta Mitchell, who piloted the app in her class, said at the time that there was definitely an adjustment period and different levels of expectations, both on the part of students and administrators.
She said that when the pilot first launched, test scores for the class using the iPad were actually lower than those using the traditional textbook.
“I had a conversation with the class explaining to them that the iPad was not the panacea of all ills. It wasn’t going to do everything for them, that they still had to think,” she said. “You have to be engaged. It’s not giving you the answers; it’s helping you get the answers.”
But even more importantly than scores, Mitchell noticed that some students who’d showed no interest in math in the past are hooked. “I have students who are participating in this class who did not participate in their previous math classes, so it does engage them,” she says. “Is it going to make them all brainiacs and straight A students? No it’s not going to do that. But it will keep them engaged.”
[UPDATE: Empirical Education was hired by HMH to oversee a comprehensive year-long study that included four school districts. The results reported above are only from Riverside USD’s own concurrent research. The results from Empirical Education have yet to be released. See more of an in-depth explanation of the study in the letter to the editor by Denis Newman at the end of this article.]
Read more about HMH Fuse Pilot study here.
- A Day in the Life of the iPad Classroom
- Teaching With the iPad: One Educator’s Experience
- A New Tool in the Class Steals the Spotlight