Army Pfc. Bradley Manning is escorted by military police as he leaves the first day of closing arguments in his military trial July 25, 2013, in Fort Meade, Md. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Army Pfc. Bradley Manning is escorted by military police as he leaves the first day of closing arguments in his military trial July 25, 2013, in Fort Meade, Md. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

Note: Some of the following information is based on Associated Press coverage

Bradley Manning was acquitted, but he’s still guilty. What gives?

Army Pfc. Manningan intelligence analyst working in Iraq, beat the most serious charge against him: on Tuesday, a military judge acquitted him of aiding the enemy. This was the gravest of the 22 counts he faced, and the one that would have carried a possible life sentence without parole.

Government prosecutors attempted, and ultimately failed, to convince the judge that Manning clearly knew  the information he leaked would likely reach operatives in Al-Qaeda.

But (and it’s a big but), the judge ruled that Manning had reason to believe the leaks would harm the U.S., even if that was not his intention, and convicted him of 19 of 22 charges. Manning now faces up to about 126 years in prison (although it’s likely to be much less). Sentencing takes place today (Wednesday)

What are the most serious charges he was convicted of?

Manning was convicted of six counts of violating the Espionage Act. He was also found guilty of violating the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, which was pretty much a given, as he had already admitted to leaking classified government information to the anti-secrecy website WikiLeaks.

What is the Espionage Act?

Enacted in 1917, shortly after the U.S. entry into World War I, the act prohibits attempts to disclose information “relating to national defense” that can be used against the United States.

Prior to the Obama Administration, there have been only three known cases in which the Espionage Act was used to prosecute government officials for leaks. The most well-known of these was the conviction and death sentence of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg in 1951 for their alleged involvement in sharing defense secrets with the Soviet Union.

The current administration has brought a total of seven cases under the Espionage Act, more than any other president combined. The most recent charges are against NSA leaker Edward Snowden.

What did Manning actually do?

He shared a huge amount of classified defense information in what is considered the biggest government leak in U.S. history.

While serving as an Army intelligence officer in Iraq in 2010, Manning had access to U.S. government databases used to transmit classified information. He acknowledged leaking more than 700,000 battlefield reports and diplomatic cables to WikiLeaks. The files included evidence of roughly 15,000 unreported civilian causalities in Iraq, as well as dossiers on men being held without trial at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. The bundle also had video footage from 2007 of a U.S. helicopter attack in Iraq that killed civilians, including two Reuters journalists who were mistaken as combatants.

Manning downloaded the documents on a rewritable CD labeled “Lady Gaga.”

Months later, after a computer hacker turned him in, Manning was arrested and held in military detention facilities until his court-martial in June.

Why does Manning say he did it?

He said he wanted to “spark reform” and provoke debate about the U.S. government’s military actions and foreign policy decisions.

In Manning’s own words:

“With my insatiable curiosity and interest in geopolitics I became fascinated … I came to the conclusion that this type of information should be made public.”
If the American public “had access to the information … this could spark a domestic debate on the role of the military and our foreign policy in general.”
“In attempting counterinsurgency operations, we became obsessed with capturing and killing human targets on lists.” The cables “documented backdoor deals and criminality that didn’t reflect the so-called leader of the free world.”

“I believed these cables would not damage the United States. However, I believed these cables would be embarrassing.”

What are the main arguments for and against Manning?

The Manning case has inspired very strong public reaction. Some consider him a hero and martyr, others a traitor to his country. His supporters argue he exposed government wrongdoing, shared information with the media that the public had a right to know about and debate, and did little to compromise national security.

His detractors counter that in sharing military documents, he blatantly broke the law, violated his oath and loyalty to the military, indiscriminately exposed valuable classified information that benefited foreign adversaries and directly threatened U.S. security.

Some of the key statements made in court by the lead defense and prosecution :

Defense attorney David Coombs:

“Is Pfc. Manning somebody who is a traitor, has no loyalty to this country or the flag, and wanted to systematically harvest and download as much information as possible for his true employer, WikiLeaks? Is that what the evidence shows? Or is he a young, naive, good-intentioned soldier … whose sole focus was maybe, ‘I just can make a difference, maybe make a change?'”

Major Ashden Fein, lead military prosecutor:

“Manning had the general evil intent … He acted voluntarily and deliberately with his disclosures. He was not a whistle-blower. He was a traitor.”

What happens next?

The sentencing phase of Manning’s trial begins today (Wednesday). He will get credit for his 1,162 days of pre-trial confinement. He will also be credited an additional 112 days for harsh treatment while being held in a Marine Corps brig. The sentencing process, which includes more than 20 scheduled witnesses for both the defense and prosecution, could last for weeks. Within the military justice system, there are no sentencing guidelines or minimum sentences.  If Manning is sentenced to more than a year of confinement, his case will be immediately appealed to the Army Court of Criminal Appeals (where the same judge was recently promoted). His appeals could conceivably continue for years.

Bradley Manning Verdict Explained 10 June,2015Matthew Green

  • I am Bradley Manning and YOU are Bradley Manning whether you
    know it or not.

    • anthonylast

      Did you see what Ford did to this guy

      rd Motor Co. is accused of developing its hybrid vehicles off of patented technology from a Baltimore company. Paice LLC claims that the hybrid and plug-in version of Ford’s C-Max, Fusion and Lincoln MKZ all infringe upon several of their patents which cover the handling of a hybrid system.

      “The patents at issue in this suit describe a hybrid system, which enables the vehicle
      to be powered by one or more electric motors, the internal combustion engine or a combination
      of these – referred to as modes of operation,” the company said in the suit, filed in U.S. District Court in Baltimore.

  • Guest

    Time Served and now you get out. We thank you.
    Probably not going to happen. Too Bad.

  • carlos claros

    i think he did good due to wanting people to see what the army was doing wasn’t good.another reason is because he probably thought that the army was being cruel to innocent people. most of all he showed the world that the army wasnt being fair enough with other culture/races.

  • Name

    I believe Bradley Manning did nothing wrong. If anything, what he did was the just thing to do. He made me realize how unjust the military is- killing and raping innocent people of Iraq. On top of that, he was tortured and charged for his actions, but in my opinion, he was charged due to the fact that the US was embarressed. Lastly, what he did was an attempt to change the future actions of soldiers.

  • Jonathan wells

    I do not support Mr. Manning should be guilty for telling the world about what the military does to innocent people of a different race or religion. I believe that the judge tried to find him guilty because if the world were to find out what the military is actually doing to the other races of the world, people in the U.S would stop supporting the government with money.

  • Niinii Hamilton

    I support manning decision on telling the world about what the military is doing. For example, they are going around killing innocent people just because of their race or religion. In addition, they are torturing people with out a proper trial and raping women fron iraq. The U.S. government is embarrassed that what they have done is finally exposed for what it really is. Bradley manning and Edward snowden are some what similar because they felt that the U.S.government is being unjustice with the domestic laws and international law and the safety of citizens in dofferent parts of the world

  • Orit T.

    I don’t think what Bradley Manning and snowden did was wrong because they are putting the truth out. Even though its putting people’s business out at the same time I don’t think they should be guilty for what they did.

  • shania

    i do support Bradley Manning beacause he told the world what people where doing killing raping people who didnt even do nothing but killing them because of there race.

  • Joshua F.

    I believe Bradley Manning should be set free due to the fact that what he did is justifiable and morally correct. I was unaware of the current situation Iraq and due to Mr.Manning releasing this information, I am now aware of how skewed and corrupt the US government and military are. I’d like to believe Bradley Manning received a fair trial, but high ranking American officials are very angry with him. Bradley did what I hope others plan to do in the future so spark some revision of how the military is operated

  • Niles Moore

    While I belive what Manning did was right, this isn’t very surprising.We have been going to foreign countries and destroying the lives of the people who lives since WWII. When you put a soldier in a hostile environment they are going to do horrible, inhumane things.We should take this as an example the next time we go to war.


Matthew Green

Matthew Green produces and edits The Lowdown, KQED’s multimedia news education blog, an online resource for educators and the general public. He previously taught journalism at Fremont High School in East Oakland, and has written for numerous local publications, including the Oakland Tribune and San Francisco Chronicle. Email:; Twitter: @MGreenKQED

Sponsored by

Become a KQED sponsor