But the practice is actually at odds with international medical policy on prisoners' right to refuse nourishment.

In 2006, the World Medical Association, an organization that represents physicians around the world and promotes the highest possible standards of medical ethics, issued the Declaration of Tokyo, which states:

"Where a prisoner refuses nourishment and is considered by the physician as capable of forming an unimpaired and rational judgment concerning the consequences of such a voluntary refusal of nourishment, he or she shall not be fed artificially." The American Medical Association has also said that the practice "violates core ethical values of the medical profession."

Dr. Vince Iacopino, senior medical adviser for Physicians for Human Rights, tells The Salt that force-feeding the Guantanamo prisoners is particularly degrading and inhumane.

"These hunger strikes represent the protest of people indefinitely detained and not charged," says Iacopino, who has examined prisoners at Guantanamo. "Many have been cleared for repatriation." More than half of the 166 prisoners at Guantanamo have been cleared for release, but for a variety of reasons, there's been no way to transfer them.

Iacopino notes that in other medical contexts – where, for example, patients need feeding tubes because they can't swallow, and they also don't resist – it would not be a particularly awful or painful procedure. But many of the hunger-striking detainees, he says, "have ongoing hopelessness over indefinite detention."

In this context, he says, "I think the pain of breaking their will with force-feeding would be extraordinary. It's outrageous that there hasn't been more response from the medical community."

Cori Crider, a civil rights lawyer for Reprieve, which represents 17 prisoners at Guantanamo Bay, says she sees force-feeding as a more general violation of their rights.

"When the military force-feeds these people ... I see it as suppressing what these people have to say," she says, "and withdrawing from them the kind of fundamental thing that makes them human, which is choice."

Some of the hunger strikers' lawyers, including those representing Jihad Dhiab, a Syrian who was cleared for release in 2009 but remains in captivity, have petitioned the court to stop the force-feeding, particularly during Ramadan.

While U.S. District Judge Gladys Kessler said Monday in a four-page opinion that "force-feedings are a painful, humiliating and degrading process," she dismissed Dihab's petition because she said her court "lacks jurisdiction" over Guantanamo "and therefore does not have the authority to grant the relief."

According to the Miami Herald, the Pentagon says that during the month-long Ramadan fast, medical personnel will only feed hunger strikers after sunset and before dawn.

Copyright 2013 NPR.

force-feedingforce-feeding

Why Doctors Oppose Force-Feeding Guantanamo Hunger Strikers