In the U.S., the film will be shown in art-house cinemas in cities like New York and Los Angeles, as well as in Spanish-speaking communities in California and Texas. According to film distributor Daniel Battsek, The Liberator addresses the absence of quality Latin American stories in a country with a growing Hispanic community.
“I don’t know that much about South America and I think that film is a great medium for both entertaining but also giving information,” he says. “And I think The Liberator does a very good job of sort of being entertaining and giving you an interesting piece of history that is inspiring.”
But Bolivar biographer Marie Arana says while the film is certainly beautiful, “there’s the matter of history — the small matter of history!” Arana was invited to introduce the film at the American Film Institute and as she watched the finished version, she was disappointed by what she found to be a shallow reading of Bolivar’s life and legacy. For one, she says lead actor Edgar Ramirez looks nothing like Simon Bolivar.
“He was a physically slight man: He was 5’6″, barely 130 pounds; he had a very meager chest, he had spindly legs, he had hands that were small and delicate like a woman’s almost,” she says. “And the figure that we see on the screen, Edgar Ramirez, is big, handsome, chunky, hunky.”
Arana says it’s especially important to get Bolivar’s story right because of all the ways in which it’s been wronged.
“In the past 200 years since Bolivar died, his legacy has been manipulated in so many ways. I mean, two Venezuelan presidents exhumed his bones and reburied him and tried to cloak themselves in his glory. … You know, Francisco Franco, who was the right-wing dictator of Spain, and Augusto Pinochet, who was the right-wing dictator of Chile, took him as their hero, and so did the revolutionaries, like Fidel Castro and Che Guevera. So this is a life that has been used for many purposes.”
One of the ideas the film gets right, Arana says, is the multiracial face of Bolivar’s revolution. On screen, as in real life, Bolivar sees a colonial system steeped in inequality, racial hierarchy and slavery, and fights to dismantle those divisions. For Edgar Ramirez, that legacy of Bolivar’s liberation still matters because “one of the greatest debates in Latin America will always be the social gap between rich people and poor people and that is something we inherited from colonial times. … There were so many privileges within the colonial system given by social position and racial background. That, I think, has affected how our societies developed and Bolivar was very aware of that.”
And because of Bolivar’s impassioned campaign for abolition, Ramirez says, his story in South America is connected to the North American story. “Abolition had started, the process had started, already in South America three or four decades before Lincoln’s time,” he says. “But those three generations — Washington, Bolivar and Lincoln — they are probably the greatest generations that this entire continent has ever given. And the values of Enlightenment were completely carried out about by these generations.”
Despite the film’s imperfections, biographer Marie Arana says she hopes that audiences will see it as an entry point to understand the man and the landscape that made modern Latin America.
Copyright 2014 NPR. To see more, visit http://www.npr.org/.