Peter Brook’s South African ‘Suit’ Unravels at ACT

Ivanno Jeremiah and Nonhlanhla Kheswa in The Suit; photo: Pascal Victor/ArtComArt.

Ivanno Jeremiah and Nonhlanhla Kheswa in The Suit; photo: Pascal Victor/ArtComArt.

The Suit comes to the American Conservatory Theater with a pretty serious pedigree, mostly due to it being directed and co-adapted by British director Peter Brook, a legend in the theater world. The play, based on a 1963 short story of the same name by South African writer Can Themb, has had a long road to travel before reaching San Francisco. It was adapted into a play by Mothobi Mutloatse and Barney Simon that premiered in Johannesburg in 1994, the same year the oppressive Apartheid system that Themba had lived under ended.

That’s when Brook came into the picture. He and translator Marie-Hélène Estienne adapted it into a French play, Le costume, that debuted in 1999 at Théâtre des Bouffes du Nord in Paris. After the success in France, the play later went on to tour the world. > The current revival of the show, once again called The Suit and performed in English, was devised at Théâtre des Bouffes du Nord in 2012. Incorporating the music direction of Franck Krawcyzk, The Suit premiered in Paris that year and was followed up with another world tour, which is how it made its way here.

The Suit is a simple story set in 1950s’ Sophiatown, a black township outside Johannesburg. A loving husband, Philemon, who always serves his wife breakfast in bed before taking his long bus ride to work, learns from a friend that his wife, Matilda, is having an affair. Philemon surprises Matilda by coming home early, and her lover flees so suddenly that he leaves his suit behind. Philemon demands that his wife treat the suit as an honored guest from then on. It will sit with them at meals, where she must pretend to feed it, and stay in the room with them when they sleep.

Ivanno Jeremiah and Nonhlanhla Kheswa in The Suit; photo: Pascal Victor/ArtComArt.
Ivanno Jeremiah and Nonhlanhla Kheswa in The Suit; photo: Pascal Victor/ArtComArt.

Brook’s staging is elegantly pared down; the stage opens with a plain backdrop that shifts from black to red and back again with Philippe Vialatte’s lighting. Oria Puppo’s scenic elements include a set of brightly colored chairs and free-standing, empty clothes racks. The cast does a lot of miming of simple objects, and the actors narrate the actions and inner thoughts of their characters in third person, except for a long, confusing lapse into first person for Philemon on his bus trip home to catch his wife in the act.

The cast is small, made up of three actors with a trio of musicians wandering in and out of the action — actor Jordan Barbour and trumpet player Mark Kavuma play a large variety of small roles. The gentle thoughtfulness with which Ivanno Jeremiah, an Ugandan actor based in London, portrays Philemon makes the coldness of his demands more chilling. South African Nonhlanhla Kheswa is mild and charismatic as Matilda, and she sings several songs as part of the play, bittersweet renditions of Nina Simone and Miriam Makeba numbers. Her voice is lovely but tentative, and she often swallows the ends of the lines of her songs. American actor Barbour is earnest and concerned as Phil’s friend Maphikela, who also introduces the story as the narrator. He also sings a song — the always potent “Strange Fruit” — but his slow, half-speaking delivery is oddly lifeless.

When Maphikela tells a horrific story about a mutual acquaintance, it seemingly has nothing to do with the rest of the play except to serve as a reminder of the brutality of the ruling regime. The reminder may be needed, however, because the story is otherwise untouched by the outside conditions of the nation or even the community they live in. Although Maphikela says at the beginning of the play that this is a story that could only take place under oppressive conditions, there’s not much evidence of that being true. There’s a fairy-tale simplicity to the story that could be set nearly anywhere; or at least anywhere where a patriarchy is alive and well.

Nonhlanhla Kheswa in The Suit; photo: Johan Persson.
Nonhlanhla Kheswa in The Suit; photo: Johan Persson.

A mix of styles from jazz to classical to African pop, the music is omnipresent and beautifully integrated into the narrative. At one point Kavuma’s trumpet becomes the wordless voice of the suit, and during a delightful scene in which Matilda flirts and dances with it, Kheswa deftly plays both roles while having one of her arms through the suit’s sleeve.

That’s one of several isolated moments of enchanting theatricality that pop up here and there throughout the 80-minute show. But what’s curious about the play is the flatness of some of its key scenes and accompanying lack of emotional impact. When the couple’s relationship seemingly improves and Matilda gets more involved with life in her community, there is a long period where the audience doesn’t really know whether or not the punishment continues, which removes some key tension. Most crucially, the last few scenes are staged with a drowsy slowness that seems as if it might be intended to draw out tension, yet the pace has the opposite effect, as if they’re sluggishly going through the motions of the dramatic conclusion because we all know where it’s headed. After a strong start and stronger middle, The Suit nearly falls apart at the end, becoming downright dull right when it should be hammering on the heartstrings.

The Suit runs through May 18, 2014 at American Conservatory Theater in San Francisco. For tickets and information visit act-sf.org.

  • JoeM

    I agree with Sam’s review. There was so much to like here and so much talent on display, but for me, the show lacked an emotional center. We HEAR about the husband’s love for Matilda, but we don’t SEE them interacting. We HEAR about her passion for her lover, but we never SEE her interacting with him. So we never really know what the lover brought her or what she lacked to begin with. And of course, the couple never has it out. The result, for me, was a kind of emotional opaqueness. The story is clearly meant to be abstract – fairy-tale, as the review says. But fairy tales are known for their emotional clarity. I was checking my watch during the whole last half….

  • bitternot

    Echoing the review and single comment. The production possessed an extraordinary bounty in its talented cast, design, set and staging. The original short story had a poignancy equally worthy of praise. Unfortunately, all were done a serious disservice by this production. The story fragmented numerous times, and disparate elements tacked on to create continuity and a theme greater than the original tale were unsuccessful. Achieving that goal would require more time and greater craftsmanship than what was shown here.

Author

Sam Hurwitt

Sam Hurwitt is editor-in-chief of Theatre Bay Area magazine and theater critic for the Marin Independent Journal in addition to keeping up his own theater and culture blog, The Idiolect.  You can find him on Twitter cleverly camouflaged as shurwitt.

Sponsored by

Become a KQED sponsor