Welcome to HELP DESK, where I answer your queries about making, exhibiting, finding, marketing, buying, selling — or any other activity related to–contemporary art. Email firstname.lastname@example.org with questions. All submissions remain strictly confidential and become the property of Daily Serving. HELP DESK spreads the love on twitter: @ArtHelpDesk
My question concerns the issue of a “signature style” and the importance of projecting an image of consistency (particularly on one’s personal website). I’ve done a lot of different things, and tend to work in the medium that I feel best expresses what I am trying to communicate. As a result, I’ve got a real mix of things (photos, text-based pieces, assemblages/sculptures, some video work) and categorizing on my site is done by 2D, 3D, and “other” (to include video, installation, proposals).
While I can personally see the threads of consistency running through the work, I’ve been cautioned that I need to “grow up, pick one thing, and get known for it.” I realize that curators and judges look at my site, as do galleries and employers I might be courting. While I feel the need to be true to my vision, should I maybe rethink what I’m publicly presenting? Is it just too much for people? Does it present me as scattered and lacking seriousness? Maybe as a compromise, should I not limit what I make, but be more focused by what I share and exhibit? I understand that there are many shades of gray here, and it is difficult for you to comment without actually seeing the work.
Let me start by saying that I don’t believe you should put an arbitrary limit on the kinds of things that you make, and certainly never for the humdrum purpose of marketing your work. While it may be an idealistic, unpragmatic thing to say, I do believe that artmaking is the last bastion of real freedom. If you artificially restrain what you make in order to curry speculative favor with a narrow set of people who may or may not assist your career, you’ll only hurt yourself in the long run.
Paul Chan, Sade for Sade’s Sake, 2009.
That said, the other option is to continue making whatever you want, but be selective about what you show to the world. There’s no reason to put every last thing you’ve ever made on your website, as viewers might find it overwhelming or confusing, so slim it down to a manageable group of works. The first step is to take a really hard look at your oeuvre and select your strongest pieces or projects. Pretend you are starting from scratch with the new site and concentrate on quality over quantity. Be unsentimental! Make a list of these works as you go, and once you’ve gone through your images the next step is to figure out how you’re going to arrange or order them.
Surely there is a thread of conceptual continuity that runs through all of your projects, even if it’s sometimes hard to discern. Your job now is to find a way to emphasize that thread in the layout of your website. You might want to try using a standard outline for this kind of organizing because it mimics the architecture of most websites. For example:
1.) Oil on canvas, chiaroscuro
A.) work from 2012
i.) Sunset on Dragon Lake
ii.) The Coachman’s Dress
iii.) Grapes & Wicker
B.) work from 2011
You could arrange your projects by medium as you’ve done before, but you could also make an outline for a chronological organization, or by project or solo exhibition, or for particular concepts you’ve explored. If you try different ways of sorting, they might lead you to a new way of expressing the commonalities between your works. And if you really have a hard time doing all this with words on paper, you could try printing tiny images of your work and rearranging them on a wall or table until you find a combination that makes sense. Remember to keep an eye on cohesion and try to look at your distributions as a stranger would. As you go, just keep asking yourself, “Does this make sense?” If your final preferred grouping is nontraditional, make sure you have a solid justification for it.
Paul Chan, Constellation Series, Right to peaceably assemble (formerly Cassiopeia), 2005.
You can also unify the work with good site design, keeping the layout consistent from page to page. If you’re not creating a website using one of the popular template-based site builders, be sure that your font styles and sizes are the same throughout and that all your images are one standard width. Having a regular structure or format for each section will help, too. For example, if you arrange the site by project or exhibition, then in each section you could show an installation shot, then the individual works, and then a detail shot or two if the work warrants it; if you’re grouping your work by a medium like drawing, then you can establish a rhythm by consistently showing a sequence of overall shot, detail, overall shot, detail, etc. The goal here is to unite all the different works by establishing a background of uniformity in the site’s structure.
The other part of your site that can really help bring everything together is your statement. This is perhaps the hardest part, but when you are going through all your images and organizing them, think about the progression of your ideas and the way that one project has moved you to the next. What are the similarities between your works? What notions or concepts have you been following? The statement is the place where you can wrap it all up and put a bow on it, so don’t neglect this portion of your site.
When you’ve spent some time on this and feel like you have a workable solution or two, run your ideas by a few friends (or people who are familiar with your work). They may have further suggestions for you, and it’s always a good idea to get feedback on a new site from people who know your goals. Have them look for inconsistencies, site-wide flaws, and typos before you release the site to the world. Good luck!